The summer was meant to be spent working on my thesis, and in actuality, I think it was better spent working on getting healthy and gearing up for a fresh start as I enter the last year at
CMU. Many changes will come about this year, fewer classes, a bigger production, higher expectations, written documentation, and the loss of the head of the school and the loss of my advisor. Thankfully,
Mladen Kiselov will still be around in the fall to serve as my Directing advisor on the show. Phew! And
Narelle Sissons will be there as advisor for me and my designers, hopefully enabling a cohesive environment and process from an advisory perspective.
There have already been some frustrations circling this project. This is my opportunity to get it out in writing.
Over a year ago I requested an independent study with student designers to workshop ideas of design and movement on this quite difficult text... that couldn't happen. I did, however, manage to create an independent study with
Narelle Sissons and we explored the script together in a very collaborative and exciting way.
Also, I was told, incorrectly, that MILL would be produced in the
Chosky in May, when the season was finally sorted out, however, MILL was slotted for the
Rauh in December. This felt like a blow, because I had different expectations, and therefore was disappointed... however, with this new fresh
attitude and break from the daily grind of school, I am able to see this former blow as an opportunity for an added challenge.
From initial readings, I sensed an extreme
verticality to the play. In the first scene, the idea of drowning is introduced, in the mid-section, Maggie is seeking discipline from a "higher"authority. The ideas of heaven and hell, in many forms are extremely prevalent. But important to me in the process is a sense of surprise and exploration, not only of text but also space. After all, I am a visual artist in addition to psychological artist. (i just made up that term "psychological artist" but it seems appropriate). So, having a show in the
Rauh and immediately jumping to a vertical design approach was boring
because I have seen several shows in that space try to accomplish that and it basically determines that one should put the set in a corner and have audience on two sides. Boring. I had to look deeper into the text and figure out, besides the obvious
verticality, what the story is really doing. And quite literally, we are
drowning. Ideas of swimming pools, a river , the mill all came out. Movement, movement, movement became so important. I needed a space that could transform in a highly theatrical way. No tricks, no set pieces automated and slided in and out, the space must be defined by the scenes and the play exist in transition only. This play is so much about transition. Maggie is always changing. Her world is static, but she is
constantly challenging, succumbing, adjusting to new insights and environments. If Maggie is our heroine, our voice, our relative, we must see the world through her eyes. That means we are seeing the world the the hugely imaginative eye of a child. A perpetual child who suffers from being an incredible person in a very ordinary environment. The play is largely about fitting a square peg into a round hole. It is about extraordinary people who don't belong in the ordinary world. It is dangerous and brutal for these people and they are
victims of trauma. if Maggie were born today she would be put on
Ritalin, that's if she was born today! Maggie was born in the second half of the 19
th century. She is more likely to be killed than drugged. She is a lover too. She is constantly trying to find love. So at it's most basic level this is a love story. An impossible love story. And that sense of impossibility must be evident. The audience is living her life with her and should feel the roller coaster. They should be trying to keep up with the quick pace and high energy mill that keeps churning. There is no question that Maggie is going to die, but the audience must keep hoping that she finds a way out. At the end, the audience should feel totally wiped out. Exhausted and mesmerized. How did they do all that? Is this the same space we entered almost 2 hours ago, when did it become how it is now? A magical journey is in store for the audience. A hugely theatrical, impossible to capture on camera, event.
The most recent turn of events, a little blip on the radar after all is said and done, but quite unnerving right now, is the recent departure of my
dramaturge. Last year, I assumed a I would be given a capable student
dramaturge, but due a shortage of
dramaturgy students, no one was assigned to the show. bah humbug. After many emails and frustrations, Jay Ball agreed to take on the show, even though he was leaving
CMU School of Drama after the fall semester. Just two weeks ago, Jay emailed that he could no longer do the show.... not his fault, but I was pretty, well, let's say frustrated. A part of the thesis is a cohesive analysis of the play, it's origin, the playwright, the period it's set in, the period it's written, how it meets with society today, and, of course, answers to what everything in the play means. A
dramaturge is an enormous
asset to this part of the development process. Not having a
dramaturge at all is still unthinkable. I am hopeful a recommendation of a faculty member in the literature dept. will step up to the challenge. Otherwise, I have a lot more work in store.
I know these types of frustrations will come and go. They have little to do with WHY I chose this play and the ultimate WHAT that will be created. This is because ALL of these challenges become
parameters to work within. The structure of the play is not completely unlimited. There are budgets, and students and schedules and spaces to be considered. These are realities that affect the daily ins and outs, but have NO power over the art we create. That IS limitless. My job is to tell an amazing story, I can do that with two sticks and a lampshade, (luckily I don't have to). So rather than focus on these
nitty-gritty details of politics and logistics, I must focus on the story I want to tell-- which I have not fully thought
thru yet. I need to know these characters as though they are my family and watch and guide the actors into unique and exciting living creatures. I need to work with the other artists to gather all resources and make something important